Hillary’s Experience, Again

Kay Steiger has responded to my and Matt Zeitlin’s criticism of her “Hillary is experienced for a woman” post. Matt ably dispatches most of her rebuttals, but there are a few things I want to note. Like this:

The fact that my post engendered such a vehement no suggests that women face endless challenges when it comes to the merging of public and private lives.

Yeah, I just secretly hate female politicians. Absolutely. It’s nice to know that we can have a debate over a major presidential candidate’s argument that she’s the most experienced contender without resorting to petty accusations of sexism.
But that’s not the worst part of the response. Oh, if only that were the worst part:

I don’t expect female candidates for president to be held to “lower standards,” but rather I asked a question. What does count? The answer was overwhelmingly in favor of the existing paradigm.

Here’s what Steiger wrote in her first post:

I’m not saying that Clinton’s experience as a first lady qualifies her to be a presidential candidate — there are plenty of legitimate reasons to pick on Clinton — but it does beg the question: If women are barely represented in high-level offices, how are they supposed to “qualify” themselves for a presidential run?

It’s pretty clear, from this question, that Steiger was saying there must be some way other than holding a “high-level office” for a woman to qualify herself for the presidency. Simply put, Steiger did call for female candidates to be held to “lower standards”, as I put it in my response to her first post, or at least different standards. I think it would require a pretty strained reading of her words to come to a different conclusion.
One last thing:

[M]y post on Hilary Clinton’s first lady experience brought about exactly the reaction I might have expected: the assumption that I desire Clinton to win the candidacy and the presidency because my vote as a feminist means I will throw my support behind whatever woman approaches spitting distance.
Let’s just be clear about one thing: I do no such thing.

Yes she does. Again, let’s return to her original post:

Hillary Clinton has great experience for a woman. There are few women as qualified as Hillary Clinton for a candidacy. There’s a smattering of female governors, a mere 16 female senators (two of whom were elected in 2006 midterm elections), and a handful of high-ranking and high-profile secretaries. There just aren’t a lot of “qualified” women to pull candidates from.

Now, the only reason anyone would ever care about if a candidate’s experienced “for a woman” is if one wants to elect a woman to begin with. It makes perfect sense to read this paragraph – as I and most TAPPED readers did – as saying that Steiger wants to elect a woman as president, and thus compares the female candidate in the race’s experience not to the other (male) candidates in the race, but to other female politicians. That comparison isn’t at all relevant if one is interesting in electing the best president. It is relevant if one wants, above all else, to elect a woman. I don’t want that. The above paragraph strongly implies that Steiger does.

4 thoughts on “Hillary’s Experience, Again

  1. I thank you for your thoughts, but I’m surprised to read your conclusion. It suggests you’ve made a decision about how I vote for me. The paragraph you cite is incomplete. The original post talked of the subtext I drew from Healy’s article, not my own position.

  2. I certainly didn’t intend to cast your vote for you; given as I volunteer at my local Obama office, that would be a curious vicarious vote indeed. I based my conclusion off of my reading of your first post; if I misread it, I apologize, but I read it, and I suspect many TAPPED readers read it, as supporting Clinton because of her gender.

  3. Haha, while we may have written “exactly the same blog post,” the link was to you. And while I’m all for assuming a contributor to a widely read liberal blog was discussing one of my arguments, it sure wasn’t me that got the subsequent traffic spike. And we all know that in this business, traffic is where it’s at…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s