Hey Paul, Hey Paul, Hey Paul, Let’s Have a Ball

This, from Tim Lee, strikes me as wrong:

Seven years ago, no one would have disputed that Ron Paul was a conservative Republican in the Buckley/Goldwater/Reagan mold. But nowadays, the primary criteria for membership in the conservative coalition seem to be loyalty to the president’s agenda and a general suspicion of foreigners.

The problem is that, seven years ago, Paul was a Congressman, just as he is today. And he wasn’t an especially obscure one – while they’ve become more widely known during his presidential bid, his views on dismantling the federal government and withdrawing from any and all international organizations had been firmly established by then. He was already being called Dr. No, for doing things like voting against giving Congressional medals to Rosa Parks and Tony Blair (Paul said they’re unconstitutional – because Ron Paul is, first and foremost, a serious person). Anyone who knew Ron Paul in 2000 knew that he was nothing like Buckley, or Goldwater, or Reagan. If anything, he was like Buchanan. Except, you know, on crack.

2 thoughts on “Hey Paul, Hey Paul, Hey Paul, Let’s Have a Ball

  1. Its really sad that an entire philosophical idea of government could so quickly be reduced to “G.W. Bush”, and… to quote you, “loyalty to the president’s agenda”. I am truely shamed to be an American. When I travel abroad I tell everyone I meet that those figures are NOT representation of the People. Ron Paul 2008.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s