It always bugs me that

It always bugs me that normally logical people are falling for the appeasement argument in Spain. The reason that the Spanish people ousted Aznar is that he failed to protect them against terrorism. He was focusing too heavily on Iraq, and thus forgot that al-Qaeda is actually a threat, unlike Iraq. Zapareto has carried with him a responsibility to better protect Spain against terrorism, and if there is another attack, he will, rightfully, be kicked out of office. To me, this seems much more logical than the argument that Bush will be better off after an attack. Wouldn’t that mean that the “war on terror” failed?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s